ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	73.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z620 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 158A
Memory	119.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191029
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 09 '22 at 13:55
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2 551 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Memory 48.7 1-Core 64.6 2-Core 128 45% 80.3 Pts	4-Core 263 8-Core 526 46% 394 Pts	64-Core 1,665 103% 1,665 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% MSI(1462 C75A) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Lighting 91.7 Reflection 90.4 Parallax 84.5 75% 88.9 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 81.2 Splatting 73.7 71% 89.2 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hgst HUSMM8040ASS200 400GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 263GB free (System drive) Firmware: A210 SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 381 401 336 419 424 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Read 341 Write 418 Mixed 356 SusWrite 397 86% 378 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 43.1 4K Mixed 27.5 97% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 416 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 294 227% 315 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 104%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90 97,624 User benchmarks, average bench 204% 161GB free Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 576 421 427 365 430 431 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 629 Write 580 Mixed 593 SusWrite 442 126% 561 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 40.5 4K Mixed 33.9 113% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 399 DQ Write 518 DQ Mixed 440 337% 452 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 237%
Seagate ST4000NM0023 4TB 130 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3.5TB free Firmware: E007 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 20 22 18 22 22 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 181 Write 21.2 Mixed 42.4 SusWrite 21 49% 66.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.9 188% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 99%
Seagate ST4000NM0023 4TB 130 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3TB free Firmware: E007 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 20 22 18 22 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Read 174 Write 20.1 Mixed 44.1 SusWrite 21.1 48% 64.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.8 181% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT84GR7AMR4C-H9 4x31.8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 4 of 12 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (89^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	55.8% Above average	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 20.8 65% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 4 15% 5.3 GB/s	Latency 166 24% 166 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	154x
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	152x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	131x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	174x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	96x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	61x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 98%, 24 samples	21x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback