Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3396
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 08 '22 at 16:43
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 147
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 226
31% 228 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450
XFX(1682 3200) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.79% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 2.3
2% 2.43 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2
Splatting 2
2% 2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.79%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X2256G 256GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0920A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 71 27 49 19 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 478
Write 397
Mixed 111
SusWrite 65.8
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 4.1
75% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 0.3
67% 158 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 98%
USB3.0 500GB
216GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 186 192 191 193 192 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 376
Write 373
Mixed 159
SusWrite 190
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 17.5
53% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 59.1
DQ Write 43.9
DQ Mixed 53.8
40% 52.3 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 78%
Sandisk S3512G 512GB
230GB free
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 232 238 237 237 237 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58% Above average
Read 254
Write 185
Mixed 226
SusWrite 236
51% 225 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 23.1
79% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 199
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 58%
Great: 119%
USB3.0 500GB
172GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 186 192 191 193 192 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 298
Write 342
Mixed 312
SusWrite 190
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 22.2
4K Mixed 19
61% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 46.1
DQ Write 41.5
DQ Mixed 44.2
33% 43.9 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-UD3-1600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 15.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 10.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,849 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback