Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49 19,990 User benchmarks, average bench 43% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Memory 69 1-Core 37.7 2-Core 75.1 40% 60.6 Pts	4-Core 145 8-Core 150 20% 148 Pts	64-Core 151 9% 151 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 60GB 2,308 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: V2.10 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 211 Write 61.2 Mixed 53.4 23% 109 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 21.7 4K Mixed 10.3 61% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 28.5 DQ Write 26.1 DQ Mixed 11.2 13% 21.9 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 70%
WD WD2500JB-00REA0 250GB-$150 998 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 53GB free Firmware: 08.02D08 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,800 Write 20 Mixed 37.6 444% 619 MB/s	4K Read 188 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.9 7,971% 63.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 33%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 127GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 28GB free, PID 558b Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 0 0.1 5.5 9.6 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 17.9 Mixed 20.9 SusWrite 6.2 23% 19 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.6 130% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	20.4% Poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 6.2 18% 6.47 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 5.8 18% 6.13 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	16x
Core2 Quad Q9300Intel $38Bench 46%, 10,428 samples	8x
Xeon E5450Intel $195Bench 51%, 10,801 samples	8x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	6x
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples	5x
GeForce GTX 285NvidiaBench 9%, 2,842 samples	5x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x
Fury 240GBHyperX $65Bench 71%, 27,826 samples	3x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	3x

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $180