Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P7350-$43 2,717 User benchmarks, average bench 35% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Memory 42 1-Core 31 2-Core 52.9 27% 42 Pts	4-Core 58.1 8-Core 54.7 8% 56.4 Pts	64-Core 58 4% 58 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$71 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11.01A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 28 27 23 9.3 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Read 40.8 Write 11.8 Mixed 28 SusWrite 20.5 19% 25.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.3 74% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 41%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 252GB 95 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 235GB free, PID 5595 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 15 14 5.5 6.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 29.6 Write 16.7 Mixed 12.3 SusWrite 12.4 22% 17.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.3 135% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.87 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 4 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 193 21% 193 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16