PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Apple MacPro2,1 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Apple Mac-F4208DC8 |
Memory | 3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20070702 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 02 '22 at 11:03 |
Run Duration | 198 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5345
CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
|
43%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
34%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intenso Sata III 480GB
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 183 184 187 179 176 MB/s
|
53%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
51GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 340 311 311 310 311 MB/s
|
98%
Outstanding
|
|||
MX MXUB3MAEX-64G 64GB
19GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 24 24 24 23 15 MB/s
|
11.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 512, 512, 1024, 1024, 512, 512 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
16%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X53651stBench 44%, 504 samples | 16x |
CPU: Intel Xeon 51501stBench 40%, 627 samples | 14x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X53551stBench 42%, 426 samples | 13x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples | 9x |
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples | 6x |
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 15% - Very poor | Total price: $35 |