Apple MacPro2,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacPro2,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F4208DC8
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '22 at 11:03
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5345
CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
43% Average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 30.5
2-Core 60.8
35% 51.6 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 246
22% 184 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34% Below average
Lighting 47.5
Reflection 37.2
Parallax 52.5
39% 45.7 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 43.6
Splatting 21.8
25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 480GB
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 183 184 187 179 176 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53% Above average
Read 201
Write 200
Mixed 187
SusWrite 178
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 30.4
102% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 32.3
DQ Write 68
DQ Mixed 41.8
34% 47.4 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53%
Great: 101%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
51GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 340 311 311 310 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 652
Write 524
Mixed 385
SusWrite 336
106% 474 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 35.9
121% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 298
225% 305 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 98%
Great: 236%
MX MXUB3MAEX-64G 64GB
19GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 24 24 24 23 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.9% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 24.2
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 20.9
34% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
46% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 512, 512, 1024, 1024, 512, 512 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 5.7
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 4
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro2,1 Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacPro2,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $35
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback