Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	97.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HUANANZHI
Motherboard	HUANANZHI X99-AD4
Memory	47.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201015
Uptime	15.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '22 at 11:52
Run Duration	543 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4 3,726 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 87.7 2-Core 175 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 710 63% 532 Pts	64-Core 1,637 101% 1,637 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266 254,908 User benchmarks, average bench 98% ASRock(1849 5101) ≥ 4GB Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.5% Outstanding	Lighting 123 Reflection 143 Parallax 184 100% 150 fps	MRender 122 Gravity 128 Splatting 96.2 92% 115 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket Q4 2TB 2,089 User benchmarks, average bench 250% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: RKT40Q.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 668 564 100 94 105 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 535 Write 655 Mixed 526 SusWrite 262 111% 495 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 93.5 4K Mixed 57.1 180% 62.9 MB/s	DQ Read 703 DQ Write 516 DQ Mixed 601 451% 607 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 421%
Sabrent Rocket Q 500GB 1,201 User benchmarks, average bench 139% 250GB free Firmware: RKT30Q.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1000 990 452 95 87 123 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	139% Outstanding	Read 843 Write 999 Mixed 870 SusWrite 458 179% 792 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 56.9 190% 67.9 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 453 DQ Mixed 474 339% 430 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 214%
WD WD101EFBX-68B0AN0 10TB 547 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 72GB free Firmware: 85.00A85 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 97 98 98 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Read 208 Write 205 Mixed 107 SusWrite 96.1 113% 154 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 1.4 356% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 118%
ST10000V N0008-2PJ103 10TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 90GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 114 110 114 115 113 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	77.4% Very good	Read 208 Write 210 Mixed 199 SusWrite 112 244% 182 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.6 333% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 77%
ST10000V N0008-2PJ103 10TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 91GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 114 114 115 113 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	85% Excellent	Read 254 Write 242 Mixed 204 SusWrite 113 267% 203 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 1.9 352% 10.9 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 77%
ST10000V N0008-2PJ103 10TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 91GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 112 109 112 116 111 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	83.5% Excellent	Read 248 Write 250 Mixed 209 SusWrite 110 270% 204 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 1.5 336% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 77%
ST10000V N0008-2PJ103 10TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 91GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 112 109 112 116 111 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	83% Excellent	Read 249 Write 244 Mixed 191 SusWrite 110 261% 199 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 1.9 342% 10.1 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GB 1,230 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	MC Read 57.6 MC Write 52.1 MC Mixed 46.5 149% 52.1 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 17.3 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 127%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback