MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20210303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '22 at 00:32
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 90
1-Core 137
2-Core 274
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 862
86% 701 Pts
64-Core 1,100
68% 1,100 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$120
CLim: 1412 MHz, MLim: 2200 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Lighting 75.4
Reflection 65.5
Parallax 97.7
61% 79.5 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 48.5
50% 62.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,761
Write 829
Mixed 2,010
410% 1,867 MB/s
4K Read 77.6
4K Write 276
4K Mixed 119
416% 158 MB/s
DQ Read 2,400
DQ Write 2,168
DQ Mixed 2182
1,665% 2,250 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
1GB free
Firmware: SDM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 49.5
Write 86.3
Mixed 54
47% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.4
169% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 70%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
875GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 114 115 113 115 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 64.8
Write 62.3
Mixed 49
SusWrite 114
53% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
1GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 93.7
Write 73.5
Mixed 50.8
54% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 105%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$71
461GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 146 147 146 147 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 144
Write 137
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 147
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 100%
MB6000GEBTP 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: HPG1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 160 161 159 161 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 164
Mixed 80
SusWrite 160
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 100%
ST1000DM 003-1SB102 1TB
918GB free, PID 2773
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 191 192 191 191 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 163
Write 42
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 188
150% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 70%
USB DISK 3.2 248GB
8GB free, PID 6300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 68 68 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 158
Write 3.8
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 65.2
54% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
32% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
94.7% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 37.3
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 36.3
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 67.3
60% 67.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $988
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback