Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 400 G1 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G1 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 198E
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '22 at 22:45
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 199
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 386
52% 386 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 11C7) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 18.5
14% 18.2 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 17.1
14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 169 65 74 67 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 313
Write 233
Mixed 240
SusWrite 109
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 30.5
130% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 162
138% 200 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 87%
Toshiba HDWQ140 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: FJ1M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 197 199 200 199 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 189
Mixed 103
SusWrite 197
125% 170 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
291% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17.5
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 18.1
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G1 MT Builds (Compare 1,088 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G1 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback