Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 186%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 176%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics209% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJun 25 '22 at 11:19
Run Duration399 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$320
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 87.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 246
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 972
87% 732 Pts
64-Core 970
60% 970 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$625
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Lighting 313
Reflection 267
Parallax 309
255% 296 fps
MRender 330
Gravity 249
Splatting 180
199% 253 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 209%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 1437 1007 783 786 582 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2,586
Write 2,451
Mixed 1,795
SusWrite 842
429% 1,918 MB/s
4K Read 66
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 91.4
309% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,536
DQ Write 1,292
DQ Mixed 1,370
1,038% 1,400 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 314%
Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
24GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 444
Write 441
Mixed 389
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 53
172% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 210
158% 212 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
327GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 438 432 434 431 416 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 424
Mixed 422
SusWrite 431
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 49.6
162% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 209
156% 209 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 105%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
699GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 876 467 466 466 467 468 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
171GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 150 154 156 154 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 155
Mixed 103
SusWrite 153
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
216% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 112%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
428GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 130 140 139 128 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 131
Write 136
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 136
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 1.8
362% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 81
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 30.9
122% 42.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 29.3
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,724 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $929
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback