QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '22 at 08:51
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Common KVM processor
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 62.9
2-Core 130
52% 87.3 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 399
41% 328 Pts
64-Core 364
23% 364 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro GV100
Nvidia(10DE 11A0) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 154
Parallax 232
150% 190 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 195
Splatting 111
127% 162 fps
Poor: 114%
This bench: 134%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 137GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 136 134 136 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 164
Write 160
Mixed 181
SusWrite 134
119% 160 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 6
1,017% 5.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.9% Average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 19
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 7
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback