Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 21 '22 at 23:20
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 79.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 717
72% 585 Pts
64-Core 885
55% 885 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
EVGA(3842 6167) 3GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.2% Good
Lighting 75.3
Reflection 74.8
Parallax 68.4
61% 72.8 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 75
Splatting 68.9
58% 71 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900P13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 147 180 122 64 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 472
Write 320
Mixed 341
SusWrite 163
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 40.5
149% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 218
186% 271 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D26BFSC.8FB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 31.6
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 29.2
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,721 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback