Acer Nitro N50-600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics191% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro N50-600  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-600
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190416
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 21 '22 at 15:01
Run Duration735 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 80.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 243
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 683
73% 584 Pts
64-Core 703
44% 703 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
191% Outstanding
Lighting 276
Reflection 257
Parallax 313
225% 282 fps
MRender 320
Gravity 230
Splatting 176
190% 242 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 191%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-128G-1014 128GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 830
Write 733
Mixed 312
138% 625 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 97.8
4K Mixed 42.4
151% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 361
265% 346 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 155%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
681GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 42 42 42 41 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.3% Very poor
Read 40.5
Write 41
Mixed 40
SusWrite 41.4
9% 40.7 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 13
41% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 27
DQ Write 26.5
DQ Mixed 13.7
14% 22.4 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
728GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 189 191 193 191 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 187
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 190
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 106%
Great: 113%
Garmin eTrex Touch Flas 8GB
3GB free, PID 285c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.1 0.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.82% Terrible
Read 2
Write 1.7
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 0.9
2% 1.52 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.82%
Great: 5%
ST500LT0 12-1DG142 500GB
248GB free, PID 0569
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 36.7
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 41.7
48% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 35%
Garmin eTrex Touch SD C 16GB
9GB free, PID 285c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 0.2
Mixed 0.2
0% 0.2 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.6
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro N50-600 Builds (Compare 4,506 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Acer Nitro N50-600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback