Today's hottest deals

HP 18-3204LA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 18-3204LA  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B00
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130702
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 21 '22 at 04:09
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Memory 49.2
1-Core 16.8
2-Core 32.7
24% 32.9 Pts
4-Core 28.5
8-Core 30.5
4% 29.5 Pts
64-Core 31.8
2% 31.8 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
HP(103C 2B00) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.94% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.33 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 2
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.94%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 112 69 67 72 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 354
Write 295
Mixed 162
SusWrite 95.5
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 4.4
29% 9.43 MB/s
DQ Read 74.2
DQ Write 45.5
DQ Mixed 4.3
18% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1L16BC4R1-B1GS 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.33 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 2.5
7% 2.37 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 18-3204LA Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 18-3204LA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback