HP Pavilion x360 Convertible 11m-ap0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion x360 Convertible 11m-ap0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 85CA
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220330
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateJun 20 '22 at 00:58
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N5030
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Memory 32.7
1-Core 56.3
2-Core 102
35% 63.6 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 205
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
HP(103C 85CA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.44% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 3.3
2% 2.6 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 3.3
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.44%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLH128HBHQ-000H1 128GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT22H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 209 211 206 211 210 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 354
Write 210
Mixed 250
SusWrite 208
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 33.9
123% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 230
172% 230 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 98%
Generic MassStorageClass 256GB
238GB free, PID 0765
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 124 127 124 127 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 164
Write 130
Mixed 99.8
SusWrite 124
170% 130 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 3.6
255% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4A8G165WC-BCTD 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
24.6% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.07 GB/s
Latency 239
17% 239 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion x360 Convertible 11m-ap0xxx Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion x360 Convertible 11m-ap0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback