Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 19 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJun 18 '22 at 19:22
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 86.5
1-Core 131
2-Core 245
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 642
66% 534 Pts
64-Core 684
42% 684 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 8834) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 192
Reflection 169
Parallax 166
157% 176 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 136
Splatting 117
116% 145 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 134%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 316 234 216 212 209 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 419
Write 361
Mixed 343
SusWrite 244
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 49.7
158% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 354
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
49GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 76 83 79 71 99 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.4% Very poor
Read 37.3
Write 58.6
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 76.6
12% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 22.8
4K Mixed 6.4
26% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 58.4
DQ Write 96.8
DQ Mixed 46
44% 67.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 85%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
925GB free
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1151 334 331 334 328 322 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1286
Write 1455
Mixed 1,155
SusWrite 467
245% 1,091 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 63.9
211% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 1,243
DQ Write 880
DQ Mixed 1072
798% 1,065 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 193%
Great: 276%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
953GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 116 114 117 117 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 93.6
Write 83.2
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 115
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 101%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
413GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 131 126 131 127 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 114
Write 121
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 128
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.8
344% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 136%
SanDisk SDDR-399 128GB
86GB free, PID cfd2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 232 226 224 220 228 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 220
Write 117
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 220
193% 152 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.2
181% 4.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB-$70
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2473 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.9% Very good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 21.6
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 19.1
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $893
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback