bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3.95GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3.95GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory0.5 GB free of 3.95117 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210722
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 18 '22 at 12:51
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8370C
None, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 68
2-Core 126
51% 85.7 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 115
16% 118 Pts
64-Core 115
7% 115 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 17GB
15GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 88 83 90 87 90 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.7% Poor
Read 164
Write 206
Mixed 213
SusWrite 88.8
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 8.5
29% 9.13 MB/s
DQ Read 14.9
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 14.2
11% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 99%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 69GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 95 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 204
Write 62.7
Mixed 196
SusWrite 106
107% 142 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.3
620% 4 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None 61GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
59392, 948, 3072 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
39.6% Below average
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 13
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 2.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback