Huananzhi X79

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago.

System	HUANANZHI X79
Motherboard	Huananzhi X79 (all builds)
Memory	27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201117
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 17 '22 at 06:25
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 5,123 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	70% Very good	Memory 80.8 1-Core 79.9 2-Core 159 63% 107 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 612 55% 466 Pts	64-Core 819 51% 819 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 3693) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	6.45% Terrible	Lighting 7.8 Reflection 8.8 Parallax 9.4 6% 8.67 fps	MRender 10.4 Gravity 7.4 Splatting 7.1 7% 8.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.45% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Afox SD250-120GN 120GB 109 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW201105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 51 47 50 58 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	39.4% Below average	Read 423 Write 244 Mixed 52.9 SusWrite 53.4 42% 193 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 16.9 4K Mixed 9.3 56% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 26.6 DQ Mixed 11.5 22% 47.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 86%
SSK SHE088 500GB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 11GB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 28 28 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 27.9 Mixed 19.6 SusWrite 27.8 35% 26 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 38% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 43%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,329 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 25GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 5.3 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	6.2% Terrible	Read 28.2 Write 4 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 4.9 11% 11.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.4 30% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.2% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0- 2x16GB 461 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	54.2% Above average	MC Read 22.8 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 19 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 9.9 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 79.1 51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 668 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	121x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	71x
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	67x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	42x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	39x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
AS2280P4 256GBApacerBench 168%, 1,607 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	13x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	56x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	46x
M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 96%, 634 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16