Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5570 2,341 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 63.2 1-Core 79.9 2-Core 160 57% 101 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 583 54% 451 Pts	64-Core 773 48% 773 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1200 4,005 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 1140) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Lighting 16.8 Reflection 15.5 Parallax 15.5 14% 15.9 fps	MRender 20.9 Gravity 16.9 Splatting 13.7 14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$29 14,082 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 139GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3761 Write 3,159 Mixed 3,288 758% 3,402 MB/s	4K Read 260 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 120 603% 161 MB/s	DQ Read 626 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 426 329% 458 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 128%
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB 7,359 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 94GB free Firmware: FXV7101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 421 349 185 177 177 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 684 Write 446 Mixed 504 SusWrite 288 107% 480 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 51.9 4K Mixed 39.7 129% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 480 DQ Write 414 DQ Mixed 488 355% 461 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 169%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 101 99 101 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 111 Write 117 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 100 66% 90.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:01 98 9965426-402.A00LF ID:01 98 9965426-402.A00LF ID:01 98 9965426-402.A00LF ID:01 98 9965426-402.A00LF ID:01 98 9965426-402.A00LF ID:01 98 9965426-402.A00LF 82GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.5% Average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 17.5 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 7.9 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	298x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples	273x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	254x

RAM
ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GBUnknownBench 42%, 53 samples	21x
ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 82GBUnknownBench 49%, 141 samples	20x
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	17x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16