HP EliteBook 2570p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 2570p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 17DF
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170406
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 10 '17 at 10:36
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3520M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 99
2-Core 152
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 238
32% 238 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 17DF) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.13% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.12
Parallax 3.16
4% 4.62 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 8.78
5% 5.58 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.13%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 412
Mixed 420
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 34.9
130% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 112
145% 262 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 100%
Great: 124%
PATRIOT 750GB
264GB free, PID 1053
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.6% Below average
Read 98.2
Write 94.2
Mixed 18.7
82% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 0.89
4K Mixed 0.19
38% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.7
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 2570p Builds (Compare 462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 2570p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback