Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '22 at 15:22
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 225
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 615
60% 495 Pts
64-Core 619
38% 619 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.22% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 8.3
6% 7.6 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 11.2
7% 8.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.22%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 103 103 104 102 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 441
Write 181
Mixed 327
SusWrite 146
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 33.6
139% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 202
175% 258 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 90%
General UDisk 4GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
2.8% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 3.3
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.2
5% 4.12 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.8%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-062.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 11.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $417
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback