Asus ASUS BR1100CKA BR1100CKA_BR1100CKA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 10%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive9.93% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ASUS BR1100CKA BR1100CKA_BR1100CKA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK BR1100CKA
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220509
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 14 '22 at 16:03
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4500
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
6.51% Terrible
Memory 6.85
1-Core 18.3
2-Core 26.3
9% 17.1 Pts
4-Core 33.3
8-Core 48.3
5% 40.8 Pts
64-Core 62.2
4% 62.2 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 6.51%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1792) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
0.77% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.8
1% 0.8 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.8
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.77%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS250G 250GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK9NO2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 14 12 13 19 21 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
9.93% Terrible
Read 174
Write 31.4
Mixed 24
SusWrite 19.6
13% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
6% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 9.93%
Great: 211%
TOSHIBA MQ04ABF100 1TB
263GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 28 28 27 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.55% Terrible
Read 11.1
Write 8.2
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 28.9
24% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.55%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 5.1
14% 5.03 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 2.7
7% 2.57 GB/s
Latency 434
9% 434 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS BR1100CKA BR1100CKA_BR1100CKA Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS BR1100CKA BR1100CKA_BR1100CKA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback