Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 1,371 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	67% Good	Memory 86 1-Core 70.2 2-Core 130 59% 95.3 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 484 44% 372 Pts	64-Core 635 39% 635 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Asus(1043 84B5) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 335.23 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Lighting 18.3 Reflection 17.4 Parallax 16.8 15% 17.5 fps	MRender 23.2 Gravity 16.1 Splatting 15.6 15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 16%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI Logical Volume 599GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 484GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 31 34 36 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	Read 71.9 Write 32.3 Mixed 33.8 SusWrite 33.2 32% 42.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 94% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965516-165.A00LF 4x8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 4 of 16 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	89.8% Excellent	MC Read 38 MC Write 34.5 MC Mixed 34.4 102% 35.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 10.4 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	147x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	115x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	88x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	147x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	67x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	20x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	19x