To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120703
Uptime24.6 Days
Run DateJun 06 '22 at 21:19
Run Duration1256 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 77
1-Core 75
2-Core 147
59% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 290
32% 251 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2825) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.9% Below average
Lighting 36.8
Reflection 32.7
Parallax 46.5
30% 38.7 fps
MRender 50.6
Gravity 45.9
Splatting 36.9
36% 44.5 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 115 115 104 128 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.4% Below average
Read 165
Write 163
Mixed 171
SusWrite 76.9
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 18.6
63% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 18.7
DQ Mixed 144
95% 116 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 88%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
193GB free
Firmware: AR13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 89 90 92 92 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
123GB free
Firmware: 2BC10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.2 69 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 66.6
Write 76.9
Mixed 46
SusWrite 22.4
39% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 70%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$222
556GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 7 175 176 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
WDC WD20 EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
13GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.6 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 29.6
Write 24.9
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 6.3
26% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 19%
ST2000VX 000-1CU164 2TB
5GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 26 27 24 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.8% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 25
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 16.6
32% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
51% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 11%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
551GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 22 22 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 23.8
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 13.5
29% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 21%
Corsair Flash Voyager 8GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 7.8 7.7 8.1 7.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
5.94% Terrible
Read 25.2
Write 8.2
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 5.2
12% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.94%
Great: 11%
Patriot Memory 16GB
12GB free, PID 3800
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
7.31% Terrible
Read 29.2
Write 11.9
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 4.9
16% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.7
51% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.31%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 12.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,609 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback