Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics77.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190304
Uptime10.8 Days
Run DateJun 06 '22 at 16:27
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 217
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 578
56% 459 Pts
64-Core 802
50% 802 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$244
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Lighting 107
Reflection 124
Parallax 104
87% 111 fps
MRender 83.9
Gravity 73.5
Splatting 66.9
60% 74.8 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$59
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1115D0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,514
Write 1,449
Mixed 1,113
303% 1,359 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 37.2
171% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 618
DQ Write 527
DQ Mixed 535
411% 560 MB/s
Poor: 116% Great: 248%
WD easystore 2648 1TB
931GB free, PID 2648
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 112 113 117 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 123
Write 111
Mixed 75
SusWrite 113
140% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 0.7
302% 3.17 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.6
DQ Mixed 0.5
345% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series CL16-18-18 D4-3000 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
72.2% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 24.4
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 21.6
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback