Today's hottest deals

Asrock H55M/USB3.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H55M/USB3.  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100817
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 08 '17 at 17:34
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$199
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 78.8
2-Core 157
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 398
46% 355 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.9.3
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 87.9
57% 75.5 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 67.3
Splatting 55.1
51% 62.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility2 120GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 142
Write 82.8
Mixed 63.2
21% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 8.63
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 7.08
50% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 16
DQ Write 74.9
DQ Mixed 6.17
16% 32.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 54%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$89
144GB free
Firmware: 04.04V02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 108
Write 98.4
Mixed 95.6
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 2.52
4K Mixed 0.52
141% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
30.4% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 9.2
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H55M/USB3. Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H55M/USB3.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback