Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX Z590-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive317% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z590-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 02 '22 at 16:29
Run Duration329 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$245
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 149
2-Core 293
98% 178 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 985
96% 789 Pts
64-Core 1,573
97% 1,573 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 184
Reflection 187
Parallax 190
150% 187 fps
Gravity 162
Splatting 136
130% 149 fps
Poor: 116% Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$110
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2345 2336 948 894 892 891 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 2,533
Write 2,368
Mixed 2,282
SusWrite 1,384
481% 2,142 MB/s
4K Read 62.1
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 82.9
269% 91.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,193
DQ Write 944
DQ Mixed 1,058
795% 1,065 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 317%
Great: 429%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$215
922GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 485 487 488 488 488 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 481
Mixed 424
SusWrite 487
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 48.8
169% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 171
141% 208 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$199
850GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2401 2399 2403 2405 2405 2405 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
379% Outstanding
Read 2,396
Write 2,354
Mixed 2,254
SusWrite 2,403
531% 2,352 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 84.1
275% 95.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,264
DQ Write 1,030
DQ Mixed 1,134
852% 1,142 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 379%
Great: 508%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 247GB
199GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 11 0 9.6 0.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
6.26% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 6.5
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 6.4
10% 8.53 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
58% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.26%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C16D4/16GX 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
100% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 30.6
101% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 45.2
SC Mixed 30.3
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 100%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z590-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 3,062 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 187%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z590-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,133
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback