Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics91.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '22 at 15:43
Run Duration333 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$245
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 77.9
1-Core 179
2-Core 356
107% 204 Pts
4-Core 696
8-Core 1,242
117% 969 Pts
64-Core 2,310
143% 2,310 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6950-XT
Gigabyte(1458 2409) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.4% Outstanding
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 264
Parallax 546
0% 270 fps
MRender 411
Gravity 220
Splatting 350
268% 327 fps
Poor: 183%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 214%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 42 6.1 2.2 7.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 170
Write 375
Mixed 270
SusWrite 75.1
51% 223 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 46.4
170% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 175
181% 296 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 111%
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
952GB free
Firmware: GXA7601Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3317 3322 3321 2468 1721 1707 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
421% Outstanding
Read 2,777
Write 3,295
Mixed 3,048
SusWrite 2,643
665% 2,941 MB/s
4K Read 80.6
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 105
340% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,234
DQ Write 666
DQ Mixed 898
682% 933 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 421%
Great: 444%
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN17V 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 127 122 122 127 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 57.7
Write 118
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 120
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.6
154% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 63%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 80.1
Write 99.4
Mixed 67.1
107% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.5
196% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 74%
TOSHIBA MQ03ABB300 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.7% Below average
Read 84.4
Write 90.4
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 80.2
97% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 40%
Samsung SSD 840 PRO Seri 128GB
66GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 123
Write 123
Mixed 116
SusWrite 80.1
149% 111 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 24.6
4K Mixed 18.1
1,509% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 16.2
DQ Write 28.4
DQ Mixed 15.4
1,550% 20 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 114%
Great: 153%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 140
Mixed 70
136% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.8
207% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 52.7
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 30.8
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 29.5
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 101%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 8,008 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $754
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback