Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 93.9 1-Core 104 2-Core 208 78% 135 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 501 54% 429 Pts	64-Core 504 31% 504 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.4.1 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	49.7% Average	Lighting 62.9 Reflection 60 Parallax 84.6 51% 69.2 fps	MRender 60.6 Gravity 71.6 Splatting 44.3 47% 58.8 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 53%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD PLUS 240GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 28GB free (System drive), PID 0621 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 148 112 97 61 47 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 242 Write 221 Mixed 138 SusWrite 109 228% 178 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 12.5 4K Mixed 12.2 886% 12.4 MB/s	DQ Read 14.3 DQ Write 17 DQ Mixed 14.2 1,114% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 992002 (997002) 8394 992074 (997074) 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	60.7% Good	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 19.3 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 19.2 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 60.1 66% 60.1 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	81x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	70x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	57x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	38x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	29x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	19x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325