Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80WK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80WK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '22 at 23:33
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 65%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 51.3
1-Core 55.4
2-Core 112
42% 73 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 387
37% 306 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 39D1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5206
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 37.6
Parallax 31.7
24% 33.1 fps
MRender 35.3
Gravity 34
Splatting 20.6
24% 30 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L1QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 25 28 25 25 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 2,520
Write 25.2
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 25.3
137% 656 MB/s
4K Read 324
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 3.9
498% 110 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 234%
Great: 234%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
293GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 86 81 85 84 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 48.7
Write 78.5
Mixed 54
SusWrite 82.7
49% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.1
61% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MH78HAF-2666 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
62.1% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 21.3
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 10.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80WK Builds (Compare 7,197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback