Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 247%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 278%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 121%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics209% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive443% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '22 at 10:06
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 95%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700KF-$199
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 211
2-Core 422
126% 241 Pts
4-Core 812
8-Core 1,620
143% 1,216 Pts
64-Core 2,428
150% 2,428 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 121%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,400
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
209% Outstanding
Lighting 308
Reflection 298
Parallax 325
251% 310 fps
MRender 351
Gravity 251
Splatting 188
207% 263 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 209%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$109
644GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2468 1958 1946 1983 1972 2003 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
443% Outstanding
Read 3,046
Write 3,477
Mixed 3,135
SusWrite 2055
660% 2,928 MB/s
4K Read 86.2
4K Write 227
4K Mixed 126
413% 147 MB/s
DQ Read 1728
DQ Write 1,284
DQ Mixed 1,471
1,109% 1,494 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 443%
Great: 477%
Gigabyte GP-AG42TB 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: EGFM13.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3675 3760 3746 3779 3818 3813 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
490% Outstanding
Read 2,128
Write 3,477
Mixed 2,204
SusWrite 3,765
658% 2,894 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 80.4
300% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 2,095
DQ Write 1,652
DQ Mixed 1,832
1,382% 1,859 MB/s
Poor: 204%
This bench: 490%
Great: 522%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2435 2439 2445 1752 1467 1483 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
399% Outstanding
Read 2,627
Write 2,441
Mixed 1,981
SusWrite 2,004
509% 2,263 MB/s
4K Read 68.7
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 96.3
326% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,781
DQ Write 1,395
DQ Mixed 1,541
1,166% 1,572 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 399%
Great: 399%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M2D3600C18 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 2100 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 45.7
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 42.6
126% 44.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 50.5
SC Mixed 35
99% 34.7 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 120%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 16,432 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS WIFI D4 - $243

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $1,275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback