Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 120% UFO	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 121% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200706
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	May 21 '22 at 14:27
Run Duration	220 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$240 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Memory 69.5 1-Core 149 2-Core 296 91% 172 Pts	4-Core 607 8-Core 1,179 106% 893 Pts	64-Core 1202 74% 1202 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Gigabyte(1458 4076) ≥ 4GB; Gigabyte AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ELITE (rev. 2.0) LHR 8GB GDDR6 256bit CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.77 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Lighting 188 Reflection 173 Parallax 165 153% 175 fps	MRender 178 Gravity 134 Splatting 142 122% 151 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2018)-$59 8,648 User benchmarks, average bench 193% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 101200WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1504 Write 1,482 Mixed 1,417 328% 1,468 MB/s	4K Read 44.2 4K Write 135 4K Mixed 62.7 219% 80.5 MB/s	DQ Read 855 DQ Write 1,000 DQ Mixed 776 627% 877 MB/s
Poor: 141% Great: 228%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 64GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 372 361 387 363 366 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 476 Mixed 417 SusWrite 357 99% 440 MB/s	4K Read 46.6 4K Write 96.9 4K Mixed 60.7 200% 68.1 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 352 265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 129%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$64 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 723GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 154 154 155 155 155 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Read 126 Write 124 Mixed 81.3 SusWrite 154 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1 231% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Predator 2666 C13 2x8GB-$137 7,627 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 13.7 52% 18 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 22.3 SC Mixed 14.3 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $240Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	935x
Core i5-9600KIntel $130Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	594x
Core i9-9900KIntel $385Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	504x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $275Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	312x
RTX 2060Nvidia $140Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	257x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	216x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	155x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	139x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	92x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	110x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	75x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $613

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350