Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte AB350-Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '22 at 09:05
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 74.1
1-Core 101
2-Core 201
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 630
60% 495 Pts
64-Core 833
52% 833 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29% Poor
Lighting 36.7
Reflection 40.6
Parallax 37.8
30% 38.4 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 27.3
27% 33.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jamesd0nkey JD480 480GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JD2018
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 167 70 7.2 27 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 477
Write 374
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 59
54% 246 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 1.8
52% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 74.3
DQ Mixed 2.1
27% 64.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$46
962GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 177 174 189 195 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 145
Write 174
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 187
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 Kingston KHX3000C15D4/8GX 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 29.5
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 24.5
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback