Asus ROG STRIX B365-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 70% Battle cruiser	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	77.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

24 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX B365-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191218
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 19 '22 at 00:24
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Memory 90.4 1-Core 121 2-Core 242 85% 151 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 666 72% 573 Pts	64-Core 635 39% 635 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$294 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 8732) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.59 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.9% Very good	Lighting 111 Reflection 124 Parallax 98.1 90% 111 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 94 Splatting 0.5 54% 75.5 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,635 Write 1182 Mixed 674 256% 1,164 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 48.3 175% 64.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,101 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 458 407% 635 MB/s
Poor: 138% Great: 283%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 157 164 164 164 162 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 155 Mixed 108 SusWrite 162 111% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 1 216% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 112%
USB2.0 FlashDisk 1GB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.1 4 4 4 3.9 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	5.98% Terrible	Read 20.6 Write 3.5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 4 8% 8.15 MB/s	4K Read 9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 33% 3 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.98% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB 22,274 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74% Very good	MC Read 29.4 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 22.7 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 17.8 SC Write 28.5 SC Mixed 22.3 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 66.6 60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX B365-F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 67%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B365-F GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	238x
Core i7-9700KIntel $260Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	197x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	177x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	85x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	75x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	68x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	43x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	60x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	47x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $508

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16