Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 176%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics168% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive317% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
23 months ago, 19 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '22 at 22:54
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$320
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 99.6
1-Core 162
2-Core 308
105% 190 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 1,026
98% 810 Pts
64-Core 1,551
96% 1,551 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 105%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$625
Asus(1043 8822) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (236 fps cap detected)
168% Outstanding
Lighting 236
Reflection 237
Parallax 236
193% 236 fps
MRender 237
Gravity 227
Splatting 172
169% 212 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 168%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$102
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2152 2133 1568 1670 1492 1701 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 2,747
Write 2455
Mixed 2,235
SusWrite 1,786
518% 2,306 MB/s
4K Read 73.5
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 59.5
218% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,228
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 353
347% 584 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 317%
Great: 488%
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$50
928GB free
Firmware: N1007C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 386 375 387 379 396 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 480
Write 385
Mixed 304
SusWrite 385
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 30.5
106% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 152
123% 174 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 105%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
815GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 134 134 130 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 140
Write 131
Mixed 99.4
SusWrite 132
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 76%
WD Elements 1TB
674GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 35 36 34 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 36
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 36
46% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 43%
Maxtor OneTouch 300GB
279GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 36 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 35.7
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 36.2
44% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C16-8GVKC F4-3600C16-8GTZNC F4-3600C16-8GVKC F4-3600C16-8GTZNC 32GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 58.6
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 44.7
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 35.2
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 44.1
102% 35.6 GB/s
Latency 37.5
107% 37.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 123%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,832 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $945
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback