Today's hottest deals

MSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190917
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '22 at 11:17
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 87.8
1-Core 142
2-Core 283
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 886
86% 708 Pts
64-Core 1,101
68% 1,101 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217
MSI(1462 3822) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.4.2
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.5% Above average
Lighting 67.8
Reflection 64.9
Parallax 91.6
55% 74.8 fps
MRender 52.7
Gravity 73.8
Splatting 40.1
44% 55.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-RC500 500GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFA12.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 332
Write 1,130
Mixed 196
125% 553 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 45
181% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 905
DQ Write 954
DQ Mixed 474
482% 777 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 233%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
218GB free
Firmware: CP100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 72 74 72 76 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 58.9
Write 75.3
Mixed 46
SusWrite 74.5
47% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 19.7
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 20.4
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 5,422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 136% - Outstanding Total price: $286
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback