EVGA Classified SR-X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory44GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 44GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
MotherboardEVGA Classified SR-X  (all builds)
Memory37.7 GB free of 44 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180409
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 15 '22 at 02:40
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 148
59% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 598
52% 442 Pts
64-Core 1,469
91% 1,469 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Asus(1043 8593) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 150
Parallax 139
114% 143 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 144
Splatting 126
106% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$190
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 430 414 422 427 416 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 461
Write 442
Mixed 351
SusWrite 421
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 30.5
111% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 153
124% 180 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 87%
Great: 136%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
133GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 237 234 232 122 33 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63% Good
Read 251
Write 238
Mixed 233
SusWrite 183
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 32.5
106% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 182
141% 192 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 63%
Great: 126%
Toshiba MG09SCA18TA 18TB
16.5TB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 106 108 107 107 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.2% Very poor
Read 235
Write 216
Mixed 73
SusWrite 107
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 0.8
7% 3.47 MB/s
DQ Read 2.5
DQ Write 5.5
DQ Mixed 2.2
2% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 21%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 96 94 97 98 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 108
Write 99.4
Mixed 59
SusWrite 95.7
66% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 83%
Toshiba MG09SCA18TA 18TB
16.5TB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 239 237 237 239 239 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
138% Outstanding
Read 243
Write 227
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 238
141% 195 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.9
267% 2.8 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMD8GX3M2B213 CMZ16GX3M4A16 CMD16GX3M4A24 CMZ16GX3M4A16 CMZ16GX3M4A16 CMZ16GX3M4A16 CMZ16GX3M4A16 CMZ16GX3M4A16 CMZ8GX3M2A160 CMD16GX3M4A24 CMD8GX3M2... 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
122% Outstanding
MC Read 60.1
MC Write 45.7
MC Mixed 48.3
147% 51.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.2
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 122%
This bench: 122%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Classified SR-X Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: EVGA Classified SR-X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $385
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback