Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121107
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 14 '22 at 22:07
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 71.1
2-Core 127
57% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 345
36% 289 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
PwrHis(1787 2343) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.2% Average
Lighting 49.4
Reflection 60
Parallax 71.5
40% 60.3 fps
MRender 55.6
Gravity 53.4
Splatting 40.9
40% 50 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP600 128GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 97 79 89 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 336
Write 123
Mixed 142
SusWrite 91.6
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 25.2
87% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 84.3
88% 146 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
468GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 162 165 168 164 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 156
Mixed 82
SusWrite 164
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C8 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.7% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 14.2
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10.4
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $467
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback