Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3P-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P67A-UD3P-B3  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120321
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 09 '22 at 04:12
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$70
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 196
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 362
48% 361 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60% Good
Lighting 75.1
Reflection 77.4
Parallax 71
61% 74.5 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 74.7
Splatting 70.3
58% 70.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 183 171 181 178 179 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 288
Write 202
Mixed 219
SusWrite 180
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 27.7
94% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 34.8
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 41.9
39% 59 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 91%
Liteonit LCT-128M3S 128GB
19GB free
Firmware: VQN6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 195 181 137 77 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 330
Write 195
Mixed 181
SusWrite 143
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 21.8
75% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 28.6
DQ Write 68
DQ Mixed 33.1
30% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 14.8
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P67A-UD3P-B3 Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3P-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $414
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback