Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	54.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220427
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	May 06 '22 at 14:36
Run Duration	400 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Memory 69 1-Core 140 2-Core 286 87% 165 Pts	4-Core 512 8-Core 1,024 91% 768 Pts	64-Core 2,162 134% 2,162 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% EVGA(3842 3062) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.59 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 123 Reflection 108 Parallax 126 100% 119 fps	Gravity 111 Splatting 101 93% 106 fps
Poor: 90% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 598GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2018 1920 1824 1874 1874 1901 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	283% Outstanding	Read 2,286 Write 2,743 Mixed 2,243 SusWrite 1,902 518% 2,294 MB/s	4K Read 61.9 4K Write 91.8 4K Mixed 66.9 228% 73.5 MB/s	DQ Read 74.1 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 749 387% 320 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 283% Great: 488%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 85GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,472 Write 2,338 Mixed 1,608 476% 2,139 MB/s	4K Read 59.8 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 62.4 234% 80.4 MB/s	DQ Read 633 DQ Write 686 DQ Mixed 944 631% 754 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
WD WD80EFBX-68AZZN0 8TB 736 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 1TB free Firmware: 85.00A85 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 121 120 116 115 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 122 Write 131 Mixed 83.3 SusWrite 117 84% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 1.4 336% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 117%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 3TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 122 122 124 121 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Read 172 Write 152 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 122 92% 127 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 509% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 109%
Seagate BUP Slim 2TB 10,173 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 337GB free Firmware: 1707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 78 77 79 79 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 56.6 Write 78.5 Mixed 74.6 SusWrite 78.8 54% 72.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 70%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB 5,792 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 4.5TB free Firmware: 040B SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 171 171 171 172 176 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Read 89.7 Write 118 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 170 74% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.6 192% 2 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 88%
WD easystore 2624 5TB 2,289 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 823GB free, PID 2624 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 73 73 73 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	42.7% Average	Read 71.1 Write 71.8 Mixed 63.4 SusWrite 72.9 96% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.9 214% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 65%
USB3.1 NVME&SATA 500GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 448GB free, PID 9210 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Read 39.3 Write 40 Mixed 39.3 SusWrite 40.1 55% 39.7 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 22.6 4K Mixed 19.1 1,487% 20.1 MB/s	DQ Read 20.2 DQ Write 27.6 DQ Mixed 22.1 1,765% 23.3 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 88%
WD easystore 25FB 12TB 1,422 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2.5TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 131 133 132 129 128 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 133 Write 138 Mixed 168 SusWrite 131 198% 142 MB/s	4K Read 9.2 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 3.2 286% 5.53 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 103%
WD My Book 1230 4TB 14,665 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 96GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 71 71 70 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 67.9 Write 68.8 Mixed 61.8 SusWrite 70.3 92% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 60%
WD easystore 264D 14TB 1,761 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2TB free, PID 264d Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 132 134 128 131 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 127 Write 133 Mixed 146 SusWrite 131 186% 134 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 3 288% 6.03 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139 14,506 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 25.3 MC Mixed 25.3 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 23.1 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,583 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,030x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	741x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	562x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	561x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	368x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	339x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	418x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	353x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	227x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	219x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $82Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	127x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	109x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,277

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16