| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 87% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS M730 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3128-A2 |
| Memory | 13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit väriä |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131014 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 02 '22 at 12:22 |
| Run Duration | 132 Seconds |
| Run User | FIN-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1603 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
61.4%
Good
|
57% 97 Pts
|
38% 286 Pts
|
18% 292 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.2%
Average
|
48% 63.3 fps
|
49% 61.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3E00101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 349 390 405 412 412 MB/s
|
87%
Excellent
|
91% 405 MB/s
|
107% 38.6 MB/s
|
138% 236 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5173QH0- 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
40.8%
Average
|
42% 14.6 GB/s
|
29% 10 GB/s
|
43% 92.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS M730 Builds (Compare 73 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M730
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples | 40x |
| Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 9x |
| Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 13x |
| NVS 310NvidiaBench 1%, 4,920 samples | 7x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $440 |