Acer Aspire S5-371

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire S5-371  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Minicooper_SK
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '22 at 03:19
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 145
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 228
30% 228 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 1080) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9563
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
2.66% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 4
Parallax 5.6
4% 4.73 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.66%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B512 512GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G891201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 226 254 230 240 260 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 420
Write 324
Mixed 306
SusWrite 235
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 34.6
119% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 141
136% 216 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E8E304EE-EGCE 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.4% Below average
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 11.4
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 4.9
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire S5-371 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire S5-371

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback