Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '22 at 06:32
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Memory 84.5
1-Core 151
2-Core 303
97% 180 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 859
87% 704 Pts
64-Core 1082
67% 1082 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.50.02
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47.3% Average
Lighting 59.8
Reflection 60.3
Parallax 82.5
49% 67.5 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 44.5
45% 55.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500480G 480GB
412GB free
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 241 170 176 162 166 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 405
Write 362
Mixed 338
SusWrite 198
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 28.3
87% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 114
98% 142 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 95%
Kingston SUV500480G 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 211 175 163 165 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 444
Write 416
Mixed 368
SusWrite 207
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 24.3
84% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 114
99% 145 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 1TB-$102
677GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 406 405 452 437 401 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 316
Write 419
Mixed 341
SusWrite 423
85% 375 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 89.8
4K Mixed 41
142% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 226
189% 272 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 120%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68
2TB free
Firmware: 22.00B22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 196 196 197 196 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 187
Mixed 88.4
SusWrite 196
120% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
233% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 110%
Great: 67%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 12TB
11TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 138 153 152 148 152 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 29% Great: 120%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE640 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 138 153 152 148 152 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.7% Good
Read 145
Write 147
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 147
171% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 38.1
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 29.3
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 39.7
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,037
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback