Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus WS-C621E-SAGE Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '22 at 21:35
Run Duration315 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Silver 4208
CPU1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 62.9
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 148
53% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 471
44% 365 Pts
64-Core 770
48% 770 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 166
Parallax 173
120% 162 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 158
Splatting 112
104% 129 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 235 129 167 149 176 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 560
Write 644
Mixed 280
SusWrite 190
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 25.4
119% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 588
DQ Write 429
DQ Mixed 292
277% 436 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 155%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
63GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,320
Write 1273
Mixed 979
265% 1,191 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 52.3
176% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 570
DQ Write 470
DQ Mixed 268
269% 436 MB/s
Poor: 127% Great: 255%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
931GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1729 1760 1792 1815 1692 1810 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 1,422
Write 1,877
Mixed 1,574
SusWrite 1,766
376% 1,660 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 57.5
178% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 672
DQ Write 485
DQ Mixed 422
358% 526 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 246%
Great: 365%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$57
566GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 129 132 133 132 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 99.5
Write 89.9
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 131
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 108%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121
964GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 97 111 113 93 111 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
346GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 119 119 118 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 109
Write 118
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 116
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 96%
Amd-raid ST14000NM001G-2K 14TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 15 15 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 29% Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965742-063.B00G 1x16GB
1 of 12 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.5% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 7.5
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 6.5
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS-C621E-SAGE Series Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO

System: Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $1,215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback