Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite P755

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemToshiba Satellite P755  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA PEQAA
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '22 at 05:58
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 97.7
56% 85.9 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 292
32% 251 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FC30) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2353
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
2.76% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 0.9
4% 2.77 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.76%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK7575GSX 750GB-$63
675GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 1.4 1 9 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 46.3
Write 1
SusWrite 9.2
14% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.05 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 55%
General USB Flash Disk 64GB
5GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 3.8 2.6 2.9 6.8 7.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
4.09% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 1
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 4
9% 8.07 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.09%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
47.5% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 11.9
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite P755 Builds (Compare 207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite P755

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback