HP 255 G8 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 255 G8 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8905
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211020
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateApr 09 '22 at 09:49
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 51.3
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 144
52% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 647
57% 484 Pts
64-Core 641
40% 641 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8905) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.50.22
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
6.62% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 18.9
5% 11.5 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 15.4
Splatting 15.5
11% 12.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.62%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC711 HFM256GD3JX013N 256GB
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1119 1115 445 440 436 436 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,491
Write 1,226
Mixed 1067
SusWrite 665
249% 1,112 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 66.6
218% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 793
DQ Write 593
DQ Mixed 698
520% 694 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 199%
Great: 254%
MAXTOR S TM3320820A 320GB
61GB free, PID 2506
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.5% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 22.6
Mixed 30
SusWrite 37
42% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 14.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 16.4
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 255 G8 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP 255 G8 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback