Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory10 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200220
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 04 '22 at 20:37
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 206
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 365
50% 371 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.5
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 70 52 37 48 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 392
Write 313
Mixed 266
SusWrite 75.2
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 13
58% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 96.1
DQ Mixed 35.5
46% 82.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 56%
Seagate ST3320311CS 320GB
221GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 88 86 88 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 86.2
Mixed 53
SusWrite 86.8
58% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 50%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5030EB68F9W1600 Kingston 99P5471-002.A00LF Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 RMR5030EB68F9W1600 14GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.8% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14.5
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,829 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback