HP Slim Desktop 290-p0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Slim Desktop 290-p0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 843F
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180611
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateApr 03 '22 at 18:33
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G4900-$42
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 190
61% 110 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 194
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
HP(103C 843F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7925
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.4% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 3.8
0% 1.9 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 6.5
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.4%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 108 92 112 115 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 149
Write 110
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 110
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 103%
SanDisk SSD PLUS 240 GB 240GB
56GB free, PID 0735
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 147 146 148 147 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 300
Write 238
Mixed 221
SusWrite 147
293% 226 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 14.9
1,112% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 14.8
DQ Write 17.3
DQ Mixed 12.2
1,058% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 129%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 11.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Slim Desktop 290-p0xxx Builds (Compare 544 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Slim Desktop 290-p0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback