Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	19.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Memory 57.2 1-Core 21.9 2-Core 51.4 30% 43.5 Pts	4-Core 109 8-Core 197 18% 153 Pts	64-Core 182 11% 182 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 30F6) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6025 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	5.01% Terrible	Lighting 5.5 Reflection 6.2 Parallax 5.8 4% 5.83 fps	MRender 6.7 Gravity 5.5 Splatting 9.2 6% 7.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.01% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$32 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 40 51 158 136 257 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.8% Very poor	Read 1.2 Write 20.2 Mixed 82 SusWrite 123 13% 56.7 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 14.7 4K Mixed 0 36% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1.6 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 0.1 19% 42.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown W641GU42J7240NB 2x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	MC Read 23.2 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 19.9 65% 22.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 14.6 38% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 136 29% 136 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	19x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	18x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $32Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	1x
BX200 240GBCrucial $36Bench 76%, 36,559 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
RMUA5090KE68H9F2133 2x4GBRamaxelBench 69%, 469 samples	2x
W641GU42J7240NB 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 50 samples	2x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	1x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $111