LG R590-X.ARU1BT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLG R590-X.ARU1BT  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '22 at 00:25
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 113
55% 87 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 194
22% 171 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 230M
Device(1854 0807) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
2.18% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 1.1
2% 3.07 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.5
2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.18%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 130 18 27 38 32 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.4% Below average
Read 227
Write 215
Mixed 178
SusWrite 66.6
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 13.5
53% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 170
132% 180 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 101%
Generic- Multi-Card 128GB
77GB free, PID 0159
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 18.6
Write 17.8
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 18.3
25% 18 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.1
211% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.5% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.4
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 7.8
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R590-X.ARU1BT Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: LG R590-X.ARU1BT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $260
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback