AZW SEi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAZW SEi  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW SEi
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '22 at 18:51
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8279U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 242
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 509
55% 438 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Device(1E50 800C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7584
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 14.5
10% 12.5 fps
MRender 14.6
Gravity 13.5
Splatting 13.8
11% 14 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-A01 256GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1063 1068 327 328 329 333 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,394
Write 1,116
Mixed 906
SusWrite 575
223% 998 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 80
283% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 908
DQ Write 737
DQ Mixed 824
617% 823 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 215%
Great: 215%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FRS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (89th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.2% Very good
MC Read 34
MC Write 39.6
MC Mixed 13.4
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 12.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SEi Builds (Compare 725 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: AZW SEi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback